How is this “Fair & Balanced”?

I am fixing to break one of my cardinal rules and open myself up to a potential political debate.  But several things have been brewing lately that led up to this moment, so please oblige me this one post and feel free to join in the discussion by leaving your comments below.  My purpose for this blog post is not to involve my political leanings one way or the other, instead I want to bring up some questions about fairness and accountability in the news industry…

image

I walked in my office this morning and started my day by opening up Google Reader so I get up to speed on the news of the day.  One headline jumped out at me right off the bat, Juan Williams fired by NPR over Muslim Comment.  Okay, in case you might have missed it, here’s what he said,

“But when I get on a plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.” – Juan Williams

Granted, Juan is probably not aware of the fact that not all Muslims like to blow up planes. I have some friends that are Muslim and none of them have ever tried to set me on fire or blow up their underwear when I am around.  One Muslim friend and I always joke with one another that it’s those sneaky Methodists you really have to worry about because they always look like they are up to something.  Of course we say this jokingly, but all kidding aside, I believe that Tolerance is a quality we should all possess.  Okay, moving on…

So Juan Williams got fired for saying what he said but Bill O’Reilly was recently made out to be a hero by his legion of fans for saying the following on a recent episode of ‘The View’ explaining why he and his people were opposed to the Mosque in New York being built near ground zero…

“Because Muslims killed us on 9/11.” – Bill O’Reilly

O’Reilly left a key word out of his statement, and that was the word “extremist”…

Now, let me state for the record, I could care less about The View, but, hearing O’Reilly say this got me to thinking about Rick Sanchez, a CNN anchor who was recently fired for saying that Jon Stewart was a “bigot” and that CNN was ran by Jews. Yep, he got fired for that.  How are these different?

Also, let’s not forget about the time that Golden Boy Glenn Beck, who scares the crap out of me personally, said this about Brian Urlacher of the Chicago Bears

“He looks like a skinhead to me…” – Glenn Beck
– This said in reference to someone’s photograph he didn’t even know, Brian Urlacher.

And, just like O’Reilly, Beck was allowed to make good on his comment the following night by wearing a Chicago Bears jersey.  Of course this is just one of the many crazy things that Glenn Beck has thrown out there, and as far as I know he never gets into any trouble for his crazy ramblings.

My Questions for You…

  • How is it “Fair and Balanced” to not hold Fox hosts accountable when other networks do?
  • Do you think that Beck & O’Reilly’s ratings give them immunity in the eyes of NewsCorp?

Interview w/ KTHV

Conway, Arkansas was recently named as the 6th Geekiest City in the United States by Online Universities. Other cities on the list included Hartford, Silicon Valley, San Diego and Austin. This is a pretty big deal for Conway and I was honored when KTHV called today and asked me if I would be interested in doing an interview w/ them on this topic.

In case you missed the news story today I have reposted it below:

My Sunday Evening Rant

waltercronkite I was in my office this morning working on a project and before watching our church live stream I turned on some of the Sunday morning political pundits to see what they were talking about.  I heard one of the hosts say that The Huffington Post was celebrating it’s 5th year online this weekend.  They also went on to say that The Huffington Post was neck in neck w/ The New York Times in terms of traffic to their website.  This got me to thinking.  Arianna started 5 years ago, and The New York Times was founded when?  Oh, 1851… hmm…

I am not a follower of The Huffington Post, I’m not a big fan of news outlets that lean too far in either direction when it comes to their political reporting.  I like to think of myself as an intelligent person, just tell me what’s going on and I will form my own opinion. It’s for that very reason that I don’t watch Fox News. I don’t need Glen Beck to give me reasons as to why I should be mad about things, because honestly I figure myself to be a little sharper than his average viewer.  I don’t mean that in a bad way, that’s just how it is. 

Now, I do think Glen Beck has it going on, as long as people are buying into his show, he is going to continue to make a bundle from it.  Isn’t that what it’s all about at the end of the day?  You pay me what they pay him and I will go on television and convince people they can fly. haha.  But, by getting on the level that Fox does w/ a lot of their programming, haven’t they left themselves wide open to have their market share consumed by other angry and opinionated bloggers like Arianna?  It’s not just Fox either, it’s almost all of the news agencies today, print, television, radio, etc.  Back in the day it didn’t used to be that way… 

I bet the average person never really knew Walter Cronkite’s personal political leanings, he just did his job and reported the news. That’s why he was the most trusted man in America at one time, he didn’t try to put a spin on it, didn’t have to, he’d never heard of a blogger.  It was what it was w/ Cronkite.  We landed on the moon.  Kennedy is dead.  The Nation Mourns.  Of course later in life, when he wasn’t behind the CBS news desk he did do some freelance work for outlets like The Huffington Post and a few others, but he used this outlet to express his views and not from behind the news desk! 

Now, fast forward 40 years…  News outlets complain about losses in revenue, market share, etc., but by injecting their agendas into their product (the news) haven’t they left themselves wide open for this the entire time.  I have to think they sort of did.  I think it’s great that anyone w/ an opinion can fire up a blog and become a media rock star overnight.  Sort of evens out the playing field a little bit. Now, again for the record, I don’t follow Arianna Huffington, nor do I agree w/ many of her ideas, but kudos to her as a blogger for what she has been able to do.

The bottom line I guess, if I was trapped in a corn maze w/ Arianna Huffington and Rupert Murdoch, and I had to work with one of them to find my way out of the maze, Rupert is SOL…

Rupert Murdoch’s Latest Plan to Become Invisible

Okay, so I don’t usually bash people on here, unless of course their name is Rupert Murdoch.  In the past I have bashed Murdoch for saying things like, The Internet is Going Away, and People Will Pay for News, but his latest plan might be just the thing Fox and all of his other News Corp entities need to become completely irrelevant.

Murdoch’s latest stroke of genius is to have all of his News Corp websites invisible to Google’s search engine.  That’s right, you won’t be able to find Fox headlines in Google’s search engines anymore.  That should do wonders for his web traffic (insert sarcasm here).  I honestly can’t wait to see how this turns out for him…

It’s long been common knowledge, even to those who work alongside him in the industry that he has no clue as to how news is disseminated today, and has an even fuzzier grasp on the whole social media phenomenon that has taken root and forever changed the way we use the web today.

Here are just a few profound statements from Rupert recently that should make you wonder if this guy just woke up from being cryonically frozen alongside Ted Williams.  When asked about removing his content from Search Engines, here was a few of his responses:

“I think we will. But that’s when we’ll start charging. We do it already with the Wall Street Journal. We have a wall, but it’s not right to the ceiling. You can get the first paragraph of any story but if you’re not a paying subscriber to WSJ.com, you get a paragraph and a subscription form.”

By the way Rupert, you are misinformed as to your own business model dude, The Wall Street Journal isn’t hidden from Google, you can easily find WSJ articles on Google, maybe not all of them, but a lot.

I think Mashable put it best when they said Mr. Murdoch is not ready to accept any of the changes brought forth by the Internet and the social media movement. Moreover, he doesn’t seem to understand how some parts of it work. He’s got the manpower to announce a war, but I’m afraid his army will be fighting windmills.

In case you haven’t seen the Interview that Murdoch did recently with Sky News, pop some popcorn, grab a beverage of your choosing, invite some friends over, and enjoy this comedy:

For some more perspective on this story, Mashable did a great piece on it: http://mashable.com/2009/11/09/rupert-murdoch-google/

Murdoch is Messing Up Big Time

As I am sure a lot of you may have already heard, Rupert Murdoch, who I have said in the past needs to retire, plans to start charging for news content on his websites.  Murdoch, the genius who also bough MySpace on it’s way down the tubes, and also made comments saying that the Internet would soon go away, is the CEO of NewsCorp.  Fox News is probably one of Murdoch’s best known properties. 

It’s going to be real interesting to see how he plans to roll this plan out, although I don’t think he’s going to see a lot of success.  A while back The Wall Street Journal started charging for their online content, and for the most part it’s been successful, but when you look at the big picture you realize that they don’t really have a lot of competition, so all in all that content model might work on a subscription basis. 

In the much broader News business, there are tons of companies out there, and a few that even do it better than Murdoch’s companies, so I see this as being an epic failure before it happens.  Sorry for being so negative but I am just calling it like I see it.   

In case you missed out on Murdoch’s plans, here’s a snippet from a recent USA Today article: 

News Corp, which owns the London Times and Sun newspapers in Britain and the New York Post and The Wall Street Journal in the U.S., among many other papers, will soon begin charging for news content online, the BBC reports.

“We intend to charge for all our news websites," said chief executive Rupert Murdoch. "I believe that if we are successful, we will be followed by other media”.

To keep readers from simply shifting to free news websites, Murdoch said News Corp would simply make its content "better and differentiate it from other people," the BBC reports. Murdoch said he was "satisfied" that the company could produce "significant revenues from the sale of digital delivery of newspaper content."

"Quality journalism is not cheap, and an industry that gives away its content is simply cannibalizing its ability to produce good reporting," he said, the BBC reports.

The bottom line, people aren’t going to pay for news online, it’s just not going to work.  They will simply go elsewhere.  He should focus his efforts toward monetizing his content instead.  I think that most people who have been in this industry for a while would agree with me 100% on this…

Murdoch to charge for online news content – On Deadline – USATODAY.com

Red Eye: Andrew WK is questioned.

This is hilarious! If I am ever interviewed by Fox News I am going to do the same thing.  Wouldn’t it be funny if Politicians did this too?

Users Trusted LA Times Over TMZ

I posted a personal rant the other day about how TMZ broke the news about Michael Jackson’s death way before a lot of the network news outlets did.  One of my blog readers Simon Owens sent me a note that I found interesting today on Facebook, here’s an excerpt from his blog post:

TMZ has received a fair amount of coverage over the last few days for being first to break the news of Michael Jackson’s death, beating both the LA Times and CNN (which waited until the LA Times confirmed the death to report on it). But as a blog post in the LA Times pointed out today, sometimes it’s more important to confirm a fact than be the first to report it.

I will be the first to admit that there is something to be said about credibility and caution when it comes to journalism and reporting.  The thing that I have learned about getting my news via the web or social media (Twitter and Facebook) is that you have to first consider the source.  In the case of Twitter, you can just ask Jeff Goldblum or Britney Spears, who were recently rumored to have died, you have to consider the source.  Before retweeting or sharing anything I hear on Twitter with my friends or co-workers I always run it through Google News to see if there are any other headlines out there from credible sources to substantiate the story.  Usually traditional media will pick up the stories and report them within an hour or so if there is any truth to them, if not I dismiss the story as rumor.

I guess the point that I am trying to make is that I basically get my news from a variety of sources online but usually the first source for breaking news for me is via Twitter, but before it actually becomes factual news in my mind that I am willing to share, I have to also see it being reported by another credible news outlet.

Here’s an excerpt from the LA Times that Simon pointed out on his blog that brings up a good point:

Has technology’s ability to deliver information at such a rapid pace corrupted us? It’s one thing to marvel at how social media sites have helped spread Iranian news we might not have attained due to censorship — and with such timeliness; it’s quite another to have become a culture that prizes speed over confirmed facts.

Rupert Murdoch: “Internet Will Soon Be Over”

Honestly I don’t think that I have ever in my life seen someone as successful as Rupert Murdoch be as far off base as he is right now trying to get a grasp on what is happening with corporate media.  It’s nothing new, and it’s been going on for longer than you think.

Rupert, it’s not hard to get on board and monetize your content, and please don’t think for a minute that people are going to start paying for your content at this late stage in the game, especially when there are other content providers out there providing a comparable or better service than you currently provide.  I promise you some people out there will pay for your content, but the majority won’t.  For the most part you will be left holding the bag, kind of like that time you bought that company, what was it called…  oh yeah, MySpace.

Do yourself a favor, retire, and don’t ever do yourself the injustice of speaking about something you obviously know nothing about, the Internet.  If I was you, I would be on a boat somewhere off the coast of Destin pulling in Dolphinfish right now…  There comes a painful time in all of our lives when we just have to know when to hang up the spurs and ride into the sunset…

Billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch gave a strange response when asked about plans for mainstream news websites to charge for content, declaring, “The current days of the internet will soon be over.”

He was making reference to the fact that corporate media websites cannot continue to survive under their current failing business model.

The establishment media is dying and advertising revenue has plummeted as people turn to blogs and the alternative media for their news in an environment of corporate lies and spin.

This has forced sectors of the corporate media to charge the dwindling number of loyal readers they have left for news content, a practice which is set to become widespread according to Murdoch. This will only send more people over to the alternative media as the old organs of de facto state-controlled propaganda wither and die.

“Asked whether he envisaged fees at his British papers such as the Times, the Sunday Times, the Sun and the News of the World, (Murdoch) replied: “We’re absolutely looking at that,” reports the Guardian. “Taking questions on a conference call with reporters and analysts, he said that moves could begin “within the next 12 months‚” adding: “The current days of the internet will soon be over.”

Murdoch’s newspapers and TV networks, which include Fox News and the Asian Star Network, have seen profits plummet from $216m to just $7m year-on-year. MySpace.com is also floundering despite a recent move to replace the company’s entire management staff.

It was all but over for the Boston Globe this week, following a threat to close the 137-year-old publication after net losses of $85 million this year alone. Only a last minute cost-cutting agreement on behalf of its owner, The New York Times Company, and The Boston Newspaper Guild, saved the newspaper.

But it’s not just establishment newspapers that are struggling to survive – social networking websites like Twitter and corporate online video giant You Tube are also deep in the red. Apparently, paying out millions in server fees for half the population of the planet to watch clips of cute puppies isn’t a sustainable business model.

This is why You Tube is being forced to pursue lucrative partnerships with giant production studios and broadcasters, at the expense of user generated content which has been relegated to a sub-section of its website, taking the “You” out of You Tube altogether. Content that may be deemed harmful to You Tube’s corporate agenda and its multi-million dollar partnership deals, like The Alex Jones Channel, is being systematically erased from You Tube’s website under the pretext of flimsy copyright infringement claims.

The jig is up for the corporate media. If they continue to allow free access to their content they will go out of business because there’s not enough advertising revenue coming in, whereas if they charge for content they will lose a huge chunk of their audience and their influence in shaping the news agenda will wane completely.

This is the price the corporate media has paid for lying, spinning and obfuscating on behalf of the virulently corrupt power elite and expecting the population to eat it up without question.

The corporate media monopoly has terminal cancer and they are losing their power, which is why they are aggressively supporting moves to phase out the old Internet altogether and replace it with “Internet 2,” a highly regulated and controlled electronic Berlin wall, where alternative voices will be silenced and giant corporate propaganda organs will dominate once again.

This what Murdoch is really getting at when he assures us that, “The Internet will soon be over” and it’s down to us to stop that agenda from being realized.

Rupert Murdoch: “Internet Will Soon Be Over”

CNN Acquires Twitter Account (@cnnbrk)

Now this is very interesting, apparently the @cnnbrk twitter account doesn’t actually belong to CNN, or didn’t originally.  Some guy named James Cox actually owned the account.  CNN has now acquired the account from Mr. Cox for no tellings how much money.  We all know that they are doing this to turn up the heat on Ashton Kutcher. 

I have no idea if Fox News has a Twitter Account?  Anyone out there know?? They were closing in on CNN for a long time but CNN is so far ahead of the curve in my opinion, I mean come on, Holograms… 

Hard to believe, but the CNN Twitter account racing Ashton Kutcher to 1 million subscribers wasn’t even under CNN’s (TWX) control until recently.

CNN confirms that it has has taken control of the @cnnbrk account — and its 944,000 followers.

This is no-brainer for CNN, and we hope they paid previous owner James Cox a lot of money for the account he’s nurtured. By adding more stories to the feed — and links to CNN’s site — CNN.com could generate hundreds of thousands of extra pageviews per day.

Whoever is control of the account has been tinkering with it in the last hour or so, adding five CNN-owned or CNN reporter accounts to the ones it’s following.

Perhaps it’s a coincidence, but a recent tweet on Cox’s account suggests he’s recently visited CNN’s HQ in Atlanta. "On the way home after a busy two days. Goodbye Atlanta!"

CNN Acquires CNNbrk Twitter Account With Nearly 1 Million Followers

Paul Harvey – Good Day!

paulharvey One of my absolute favorite radio personalities of all time passed away this weekend and I wanted to take a moment to make mention of it.  I was on my good friend, Bob Connell’s blog this morning and noticed he had posted some articles about Paul on his website. 

I have always had a lot of respect for Paul Harvey throughout the years, he always produced a top-notch radio program that to this day has not been successfully duplicated by anyone else in the industry.  He never lost touch w/ his strong Christian values and managed to have one of the longest runs in radio.  He always tried products before he endorsed them, and believe it or not he always researched out his stories on his own and wrote all of his content throughout the years.  It’s not going to be the same without Paul Harvey on the radio…

The headlines may have gone to more flamboyant radio personalities, the Howard Sterns and Rush Limbaughs of the world. But in raw popularity, Chicago’s Paul Harvey topped them all.

He was the most-listened-to broadcaster in America, whose shows originating from studios at Michigan and Wacker in Chicago were heard by 25 million people every day at the peak of his career.

Radio legend Paul Harvey died Saturday at the age of 90. Harvey was the most listened-to broadcaster in America and his shows were heard by 18 million people every day.

Mr. Harvey, 90, died Saturday at a hospital in Phoenix, where he had a winter home, less than a year after his wife, Lynne “Angel” Harvey, had passed away.

“He was devastated by her loss. It took him a great deal of time to get back on the air,” said Mr. Harvey’s close friend, nationally syndicated radio talk show host Bruce DuMont.

When Mr. Harvey returned, he shared his grief with his listeners.

“He was never the same Paul Harvey,” said DuMont, president of the Museum of Broadcast Communications. “She was the spark, he was the talent. That relationship is now gone forever. It’s tragic.”

“My father and mother created from thin air what one day became radio and television news,” said the couple’s only child, Paul Harvey Jr., who like his parents is in the Radio Hall of Fame. “So in the past year, an industry has lost its godparents, and today millions have lost a friend.”

Heard locally on KFFB 106.1 FM, Mr. Harvey would commute from his River Forest home to his Chicago office, arriving by 4:30 every morning. He wrote his news shows and his staunchly conservative commentary, “Paul Harvey News.”

Paul Harvey Jr. wrote “The Rest of the Story” — a program his father would broadcast.

“Hello, Americans,” Mr. Harvey would say when delivering the show his son wrote. “You know what the news is. In a minute, you’re going to hear the rest of the story.”

In 2000, at age 82, Mr. Harvey signed a 10-year pact worth a reported $100 million, “the biggest deal ever cut with a radio personality,” according to the president of ABC Radio.

Born in Oklahoma in 1918, Mr. Harvey was based in Chicago since the end of World War II. A stretch of Wacker Drive has been given the honorary name “Paul Harvey Drive,” as his studios are nearby.

His programs were carried by 1,200 radio stations, plus an additional 400 stations of American Forces Radio. His syndicated newspaper column was at one time carried in 300 newspapers.

With an audience like that, words that Harvey coined — such as “Reaganomics” and “guesstimate” — have entered into American English. His TV program, “Paul Harvey Comments,” ran from 1968 to 1988 and was syndicated to 100 stations.

Mr. Harvey was never reluctant to go out on a limb. He sent out his “Eisenhower Wins” column two weeks ahead of the election.

Not that he was always right: He predicted that Elvis Presley wouldn’t last a year.

That was a typical call for Mr. Harvey, who made a career of praising Midwestern virtues at the expense of pop culture and the coasts, particularly New York. Appearing before a congressional subcommittee on offensive radio and TV broadcasts in 1952, Mr. Harvey condemned comedians “steeped in the nightlife of bawdy Manhattan” and claimed that their “girdle gags” had forced him “to turn off the radio to keep from blushing in front of my wife.”

He once described his listeners as a “vast, decent, middle-income, middle-IQ audience,” and Mr. Harvey’s politics reflected the right-wing slant of mainstream America.

When Sen. Joseph McCarthy came to Chicago in 1954, he was a guest at Mr. Harvey’s home.

He was born Paul Harvey Aurandt in Tulsa, Okla., the descendent of five generations of Baptist ministers. He got his first job at age 15 on KVOO in Tulsa.

Mr. Harvey attended Tulsa University while continuing to work at KVOO. After graduating, he moved through a variety of stations, ending up at KXOK in St. Louis, where he met his future wife, Lynne Cooper, in 1939. Mr. Harvey proposed to her the day they met, and they married several months later.

Mr. Harvey went to Hawaii to broadcast for the Navy in 1940. He was on a ship, two days out of Pearl Harbor, when the Japanese attacked on Dec. 7, 1941. Back in the States, Mr. Harvey was named director of news and information for the Office of War Information for Michigan and Indiana.

He enlisted in the Air Force and moved to Chicago after receiving a medical discharge in 1944, joining Chicago’s WENR-ABC newsroom.

After President Franklin Roosevelt died, he delivered a famous obituary beginning, “A great tree has fallen. . . .”

In 1955, Mr. Harvey began a syndicated newspaper column, “Paul Harvey News.” He also wrote three popular books in the 1950s: Remember These Things (1952), Autumn of Liberty (1954) and The Rest of the Story (1956).

While generally the voice of Middle America, something of a Reader’s Digest of the air, Mr. Harvey was not unwaveringly so. He voiced opposition to U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War as early as 1966.

During his career, Mr. Harvey withstood pressure to dump radio for TV and move to New York or Washington, D.C., DuMont said.

“He wanted to be in Chicago to maintain his connection to Midwestern values,” DuMont said. “He never did a broadcast without a tie and white shirt.”

“The fact that he remained rooted in the Midwest gave him a unique sensibility. But his appeal crossed lines from rural to urban to suburban,” said former Chicago Sun-Times TV and radio columnist Robert Feder.

“The other thing is, he was personally a man of incredible graciousness who never failed to acknowledge a kind word from peers, young journalists and others.”

And, of course, there was that trademark radio voice.

“You’d better be right,” comedian Danny Thomas once told Mr. Harvey, “because you sound like God.”